Chicago Media Examiner
TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2002 | Volume 4, Issue 18
Submit An Article TV News Sweep Story Log E-Mail Publisher Back Issues What's the Point? Subscribe Reality Check
CHICAGO TV NEWS
CHICAGO RADIO NEWS
CHICAGO NEWSPAPERS
MEDIA COLUMNS
OTHER COLUMNS
INVESTIGATIVE TEAMS
MISC. CHICAGO
MEDIA ANALYSIS
REPORTER RESOURCES
MEDIA RESEARCH
THE NEWS BIZ
COLUMNS/NEWS/BLOGS
MISCELLANEOUS
KENT BROCKMAN
Patron Saint of Anchors
THE PUBLISHER


 
UNVARNISHED OPINIONS ABOUT THE CHICAGO NEWS MEDIA
Chicago Magazine: Not For Me
By JOHN F. KUCZAJ


A couple weeks ago I got the first issue in my new subscription to Chicago Magazine.

Wait--let me back up a bit.

In June, I got a solicitation in the mail with an offer of 12 issues of Chicago Magazine for $9.95. I've never subscribed to Chicago Mag before...heck, I've never even bought one off the rack before, but considering I was being offered 12 issues at 1/2 the normal subscription rate, that's 12 issues at 1/5 the normal single copy rate, I decided to give it some thought.

Several days later (I think it was on "Macaroni & Cheese Tuesday") I decided to give Chicago Mag a chance. I really wasn't sure what to expect from the mag...pretty much the only thing I knew about it was that Steve Rhodes wrote Press Box on the web site.

A couple weeks ago, I got the August issue--the first of what I figured would be a monthly celebration of Chicago culture...a periodic education into the best of Chicago...an occasional look into the heart of the city of big shoulders. Lucky for me it was also the issue in which Chicago magazine would show off the best of Chicago!

Instead of an enjoyable read, what I got was an uncomfortable feeling not unlike that of showing up to a black tie gala wearing cutoffs and an "eat me" t-shirt.
Chicago Magazine just ain't for me.

The best of list was on oddly eclectic mix of disconnected, vapid and inconsequential categories peppered with the truly interesting.
"Best Golf Pro"? "Best Cool Drink"? "Best Rainy Day Refuge"?
Reading this best of list reminded me of the Chicago Monopoly game I got as a gift. Rather than put honest-to-goodness Chicago landmarks and attractions, the makers of the game decided to sell space as advertising (I'm sorry, but Wolley Cab just isn't that identifiable with Chicago). I had to wonder if some of the things on the Chicago Mag list we paid mentions in their own whimsical category. Heck, the city of Chicago has an exploding Improvisational & Sketch comedy scene but there's no place for it in this list, which has 3 dance-related categories including "Best Dance Shop".
Okay, maybe the list is so diverse and unconnected because someone was trying to be clever. Maybe I shouldn't bash the list. Much.

As I read through the rest of the magazine, I was stunned by the amount of uninteresting, elitist & faux-entertaining fluff filled the innards. The only article that held my interest at all was on Brian Urlacher & his brother, but that meandering epic spanned 11 pages and subsequently lost me after three.

I guess I should have known that Chicago Magazine targeted an upscale audience, huh? What do you want me to say? Okay, fine: I'm an idiot!


Actually, considering the bargain-basement offer I got for the mag, the fact that it strives to be upscale never entered my mind. I figured it was a blue-collar, meat-and-potatoes mag for the whole city.

Wrong.

I guess Primedia was just desperate to pump circulation numbers before the sale (ultimately to the company I work for). Interestingly, a week after I got the August issue, I got the July issue. Now I'm wondering if my subscription was for 12 back issues of Chicago Mag. At least the July issue had something I was interested in…eligible single women among the annual list of Chicago's Most Eligible.

Some people who know me might think that I hold a grudge against Chicago mag because year after year, they fail to include me on their "Most Eligible" list. Nothing could be further from the truth. And by that I mean, yes, I hold a major grudge. I'm eligible. Quite eligible. Really freaking eligible. Argh!

Actually, I don't see why Chicago Mag doesn't do this feature every month. I'd buy the mag - maybe even at cover price. There were some mighty fine women listed (including WFLD's delicious Nancy Pender...grrrrr!) and with the opportunity to e-mail the eligibles, I'm thinking that the July issue alone was worth the $9.95 price tag.

Okay...maybe Chicago Mag's got a couple redeeming qualities, but overall I'm disappointed that a magazine which takes its name from "The City of Big Shoulders" is targeted to the city's elite minority. I don't think I'll be renewing my subscription next year, well, maybe if they give me another insanely low offer.


Chicago Media Examiner e-mail delivery
If you'd like to receive the CME via e-mail, click here to subscribe. Whenever a new issue of the Chicago Media Examiner comes out, it will be e-mailed to you automatically.


Take a look at the previous issue: Monday, July 29
Take a look at the issue before that: Friday, July 12
* Pseudonym
Published weekly...or so.
Contributions welcome--e-mail an article to the editor

Submit An Article TV News Sweep Story Log E-Mail Publisher Back Issues What's the Point? Subscribe Reality Check


The Chicago Media Examiner is published by John F. Kuczaj
All opinions expressed on this site are just that--opinions. They belong to those people who they are attributed to and should not necessarily be considered as fact. Do not confuse the ruminations and opinions posted to this site with facts. Anyone who feels that some of these opinions should not be published should make a trip to the library, apply for a card (don't forget 2 forms of I.D.) and check out the US Constitution...specifially the stuff on "freedom of speech."
Copyright © 2002 John F. Kuczaj, All Rights Reserved

RECOMMENDED WEB SITES:

DaveKingman.com

Funny How Sketch Comedy Chicago